I see many liberal blogs are responding to Andrew Sullivan's defense of The Bell Curve. I think the book's already gotten more attention than it deserves, so let me make one simple point.
The term "racism" is thrown around far too often, and people are accused of it for trivial reasons. But if racism means anything, it's the belief that "members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races." If you believe that white people are inherently, naturally smarter than black people you are a racist. That isn't an insult, it's a statement that's true by definition. If Hernstein and Murray believed this, they were racists, and if Andrew Sullivan agrees with them on this issue he is a racist, too.
So here's my question to conservatives: Do you really want to be identified with an openly, proudly racist book? If so, you have no right to complain when people call you and your movement "racist." If you want to shake the label, though, you should do the right thing and publicly condemn this book as the piece of hateful nonsense it is.
- Racism and _The Bell Curve_
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
- ←
- 1
How would you classify someone (whom I'd disagree with, mind you) who said that inherrent worth does not depend on intelligence, but native intelligence and race are substantially correlated? Racist but not bigoted?
I suppose you could say that. Note that the Hernstein & Murray definition of "intelligence," as I understand it, is so global as to be hard to distinguish from inherent worth. If someone believed there were multiple "intelligences," and believed that whites were inherently higher in some measures, while blacks were higher in others, I would not consider them "racist" necessarily. (I'd say they were wrong, but that's another issue.)
I think that black people are usually bad drivers and white people are usually bad dancers. Am I racist?
No.
YAY!!
- ←
- 1